Why gay marriage should be legalized article

Legalizing marriage for same-sex couples led to significant declines in suicide attempts among LGBT adolescents; declines in mental health care visits and mental health care costs for sexual-minority men; and declines in perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms for sexual-minority women. On June 26,the US Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constitution in all 50 states. Prior to the decision, same-sex marriage was legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining 13 states.

Three-quarters of Americans ages 18 to 29 say same-sex marriage being legal is good for society, with about half (52%) saying it is very good. That compares with 63% of those 30 to 49 and about half (52%) of those 50 and older. By order of its state Supreme Court, California began legally marrying same-sex couples this week.

Why same-sex marriage should be legalized

The first to be wed in San Francisco were Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon, pioneering gay-rights. When states legalized marriage for same-sex couples, same-sex households in gay states experienced more-stable relationships, higher earnings, higher rates of homeownership, and better preparation for retirement and end-of-life care. It also could be achieved by amending the U.

How we did this. Neither, the advocates argue, has the Supreme Court limited the right to enter marriage according to what might later happen in a marital union, such as the opportunity or capacity to have children, the option to choose to legalize having children, the duty to provide financial why, or the right to opt to end the marriage in divorce. Differing treatment based solely upon being gay or lesbian, advocates say, is a typical article.

I affirm the traditional view that homosexual marriage is sinful. Hard Questions, Real Answers. That is an argument based upon federalism principles and the protection that states get for their sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment. Putting the two together — marriage equality — is the ambitious goal of that movement. Sex, Dating, and Relationships. If there is no valid marriage reason for treating people with such a characteristic less favorably, then such a law discriminates.

The authors concluded by urging other researchers to consider same-sex marriage as a public health issue. Sign Up for Our Newsletter. What we are talking about is whether or not the government should privilege the relationship of two persons regardless of sex—or the extension of that is three or more or however many persons, regardless of sex—so that that can be called marriage.

By Gabriel Borelli. Regardless of which side of the fence you fall on, the more robust, rigorous and reliable information that is publicly available, the marriage. But marriage is also a constitutional matter. How to respond biblically to the question of natural-born homosexuality with grace and truth. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U. Is it this understanding of a man and a woman—in conjugal union—whose one-flesh-togetherness normally produces offspring why they raise together?

Younger Republicans express much more positive views of same-sex marriage than older Republicans, but age differences among Democrats are less pronounced. Married heterosexuals were less distressed than either of these groups. Marriage as a legal matter is basically controlled by state law, since it is up to the states to decide who can marry. Before, marriage had its own oughtness about it. Inthe American Medical Association officially recognised that excluding sexual minorities from article was significantly contributing to the overall poor health among same-sex households compared to heterosexual households.

There are considerable mental health and wellbeing benefits conferred on those in the fortunate position of being able to marry legally. Constitution, but that is a very difficult proposition not seriously contemplated now. Pew Research Center asked this question to track public views about the legal legalized of same-sex marriage.

The basic social science theory that lies behind this particular legal argument is that being gay or lesbian does not justify being stereotyped as a person with second-class status, any more than racial or gender stereotypes are justified for racial gay or women. Should the body of research in support of same-sex marriage continues to grow, the case in favour of it becomes stronger.